Purpose:
This assessment plan is to focus
on the following leaning outcome to ensure that students have fully grasped the
political and technological environment of their times to provide background
information on the major cultures that followed them.
Learning Outcome: Students
will be able to compare 3 of the 4 ancient river valley civilizations in terms
of their architecture, agriculture and military and explain which they believe
to be the most successful.
Assessment Context: (1)
Students will complete an in-depth research paper. (2) Students will give
an oral presentation to the class.
Holistic Rubric:
Points
Awarded
|
Oral Presentation
Guidelines
- Students must meet at least
5 of the bulleted qualifications to earn that level of score
|
5
|
- included 3-4 sources from
outside of class
- use of >5 visual aids
that were relevant to topic
- delivery was well practiced
and student maintain eye contact
- thesis is clear and easily
identifiable
- able to answer multiple on
topic questions from the audience
- presentation answered
question assigned and supported the students thesis
- all presentation content
was relevant to the topic
|
4
|
- included 3-4 sources from
outside of class
- use of >3 visual aids
that were relevant to topic
- delivery was well practiced
- thesis is clear and easily
identifiable
- able to answer multiple on
topic questions from the audience
- presentation answered
question assigned and supported the students thesis
- most presentation content
was relevant to the topic
|
3
|
- included 1-2 sources from
outside of class
- use of >1 visual aids
that were relevant to topic
- delivery was unpracticed
- thesis is unclear
- able to answer limited on
topic questions from the audience
- presentation supported the
students thesis
- most presentation content
was relevant to the topic
|
2
|
- included 1-2 sources from
outside of class
- use of 1 visual aid that was
relevant to topic
- delivery was unpracticed with
frequent stops
- thesis is unclear
- able to answer limited on
topic questions from the audience
- parts of presentation supported
the students thesis
- some presentation content
was relevant to the topic
|
1
|
- included no sources from
outside of class
- no use of visual aids that were relevant to topic
- delivery was unpracticed with
frequent stops
- no definable thesis
- unable to answer on topic
questions from the audience
- some presentation content
was relevant to the topic
|
0
|
-No work submitted
or
-Plagiarism
|
No comments:
Post a Comment